The budget should not cut the import tariffs on parts used to make
smartphones.
Currently, import tariffs on
imported parts for smartphones in India are between 7.5% and 10%. The budget
should maintain these taxes because: 1) the current tariff structure has
already proven successful, 2) they support duty-free imports for making
products to export, and 3) changing them could harm local manufacturing. This
approach helps balance industry growth and long-term development in India's
growing smartphone market.
1-Evident Success of current schemes/tariff structure: India's
smartphone industry, with exports booming from $7.2 billion in 2022 to $13.9
billion in 2023, becomes the top performer for the PLI scheme by a wide margin.
Over 98% of smartphones sold in India are made locally. This shows the success
of deft policy interventions that include the PLI incentives that allows 4-6%
cash incentive on annual incremental production and retaining a difference in
tariffs of smartphone and its components.
2-Current scheme framework allows duty free input imports needed for
export production
Indian manufacturers must pay
duties on smartphones sold within India, but exports are exempt from such
duties. Firms can import necessary inputs or capital goods duty-free for manufacturing
and exporting electronic items. This is facilitated through schemes like
Advance Authorisation, Export Promotion Capital Goods, and operating in Special
Economic Zones (SEZs) or 100% Export Oriented Units. Additionally, firms can
use the Customs bond scheme for duty-free imports without localisation
requirements.
Big players like Apple, using
facilities in Special Economic Zones, benefit greatly from this, exporting
large volumes without paying import duties on components. Apple collaborates
with contract manufacturers Foxconn and Wistron to make smartphones in India.
Both Foxconn and Wistron are located in Special Economic Zone in India.
Foxconn has a large facility in
Sriperumbudur, near Chennai, Tamil Nadu. The SEZ unit focuses on manufacturing,
assembling, and exporting electronic products, including iPhones and other
Apple devices. Wistron operates an SEZ unit in Narasapura, near Bengaluru,
Karnataka. The unit primarily manufactures iPhones and other Apple products.
In 2023, Apple's iPhone production
in India exceeded ₹1 lakh crore (about $13.5 billion), with ₹65,000
crore worth of these phones being exported. Apple can import all necessary
inputs and machinery for manufacturing these export-oriented mobile phones duty-free.
3-Risk to Local Manufacturing: Removing tariffs might lead to a
rise in superficial assembly plants that rely on imported parts and contribute
little to the local economy. Such setups would likely vanish once government
incentives end, harming deeper, more sustainable manufacturing efforts in
India.
Imported components and
subassemblies account for bill of material value of an India made smartphone upto
90%. Rising import bill of electronic components from $24.4 billion to $30.7
billion, a 25.5% growth suggests a high use of imported components in local
manufacturing. With time, we expect that value additional will go up as more
components are made locally. However, cutting import duties on component will
kill any incentive for setting up of deep manufacturing operation in India.
Firms will be happy to assemble a mobile phone from nearly ready imported kits.
They will pack and go as soon as Government incentives disappear.
Few examples from the recent past:
One, making smartphones using tax arbitrage. During
2015-17, many firms started assembling smartphones from imported SKD kits. Tax
arbitrage provided this opportunity. To promote manufacturing, the government
announced a differential tax policy.
Import of components to manufacture
phones attracted only one per cent Countervailing duty. But importing for sale
attracted 12.5 per cent duty. The arbitrage disappeared with the introduction
of GST in July 2017. All such firms disappeared simultaneously.
The annual loss to the government
was Rs. 5,000 crore on the Rs. 40,000 crore domestic turnover. The ventures
created low paying 40,000 more jobs. Each job cost over an annual Rs. 12 lakh
to the government.
Two, export to get more incentives. Export of mobile phones
multiplied eight times in a single year. From $200 million in 2017-18 to $1.6
billion in 2018-19. Reason: the government increased the cash incentive under
the MEIS from 2 to 4 per cent. Industry sources say many firms rerouted the
same mobile phones many times. The cost of routing was less than 0.3 per cent.
The rest made products from ready-to-assemble kits imported from China. The
difference in cost of components and finished goods is just 2-3 per cent.
In summary, maintaining current
import tariffs is crucial for sustaining the growth and depth of India's
smartphone manufacturing sector. Reducing these tariffs could encourage
short-term assembly operations over long-term, valuable manufacturing,
undermining the industry's success and future potential.
In conclusion, the decision to
maintain the current import tariffs on smartphone components is more than a
fiscal policy; it's a strategic move towards sustainable economic growth. The
success story of 2023, where India's smartphone industry saw remarkable growth
in both local production and exports, highlights the effectiveness of the
existing tariff structure. Big players like Apple, leveraging Special Economic
Zones, have exemplified the benefits of these policies, contributing
significantly to the industry's success. However, reducing these tariffs could
risk the emergence of transient assembly operations, potentially undermining
the deeper, value-added manufacturing that is crucial for long-term industry
health. It's clear that these tariffs are not just protective measures, but
catalysts for fostering a robust, self-reliant smartphone manufacturing
ecosystem in India, capable of competing on a global scale while driving local
employment and technological advancement. Thus, preserving these tariffs is
essential for continuing the remarkable growth trajectory and nurturing the
deep manufacturing capabilities of India's smartphone sector.